
October 2020 | ISE Magazine 65
lot of situations, including new information and changes that
occur.
We have had people provide us feedback in ways to improve
the model, and that’s been very helpful. We’ve also heard from
people who contacted us to learn a little more about the model
as far as the details of how it works. And we’ve gotten feedback
from people within the CDC who said this is a great tool, they
appreciate it and they’ve been using it.
How does the COVID Tracer model work?
We thought there was a need to create a model to estimate how
much staff would be needed to do appropriate contact tracing –
how many hours it would take and what impact would it have
on the outbreak. It’s very similar to the COVID Surge model
in that it uses an SEIR model and we have a number of differ-
ent inputs that go into the model. One of the more interesting
things we added is that we keep track of patients who are in
certain stages, such as if they have just gotten sick, if they are
pre-symptomatic but shedding, if they are symptomatic and
shedding and if they recover. That’s important with contact
tracing because you want to find people as fast as possible and
isolate them, preferably before they start shedding. And the fact
that there are a number of people who are shedding and are as-
ymptomatic makes it very important to find those people early
and isolate them.
With Ebola, you really don’t start infecting people until you
start showing symptoms. That was one of the things that people
thought about COVID in the very beginning was that we didn’t
think people could transmit without showing symptoms. What
we did find out was people who are asymptomatic can transmit.
And so it makes it very difficult for the contact tracers to actually
appropriately isolate people who are sick but not showing any
symptoms. ... It’s all about making sure you have enough staff to
actually do contact tracing appropriately.
What are the strategies included in the model?
Those are complex strategies that we researched and found that
people have been using around the world. You can use those
in your situation if you think that strategy matches up to what
you’re doing. ... That’s one of the things we try to emphasize
with the model – we have to tailor it to your situation. This
is also something I teach in my job working with Bloomberg
Philanthropies where we teach people in lower and middle-
income countries that we have models you are able to use. But
just because a situation works in New York doesn’t mean it’s
going to work in a rural village in Zambia. You have to modify
the model to match your situation. That’s even true within the
United States, from state to state. Gainesville, Florida, is prob-
ably going to be very different from Los Angeles. You have to
modify the data that’s going in to match your situation in order
for the model to work appropriately.
With the first one, it’s more finding those who are symp-
tomatic and isolating them. That may not work as well because
by the time they are symptomatic, they have already been out
in the wild transmitting. In the second situation, you are again
focusing on those who are symptomatic and their contacts, and
you’re asking the contact as soon as they show symptoms to iso-
late yourself, contact the people in the public health department
so they can start tracking you. Again, that is a slight problem in
that by the time they show symptoms, there are some who are
asymptomatic and they’re already spreading.
With the third situation, it is again isolating those that you
find who are sick but then also isolating the contacts. You also
tell them to stay at home, because by the time they show symp-
toms, they’re already at home and they’re not spreading. You
contact the health department and they can start monitoring
you. Now as you can see, with each of those different strategies,
more and more resources are going to be required. So the tool
takes all of that into consideration. But it also shows the impact
of isolating people quickly.
As I said before, these are humans, and it’s very difficult to
predict what humans are going to do. And so we add a variable
in there such as compliance, how many people are actually go-
ing to comply, with staying at home or staying in contact with
the contact tracer. And the less people who are compliant, the
less likely the strategy is going to work.
The COVID models were based on previous
efforts with Ebola. Describe that project.
Back in 2014, when the Ebola outbreak was occurring, we de-
cided to create a tool to help decision-makers make decisions,
and that’s basically what all of these models are. We created the
model called Ebola Response and we took whatever informa-
tion that we could about Ebola, and at that time it was very lim-
ited. When you have something like Ebola where thousands of
people are dying every day, you have to make decisions quickly.
With the Ebola model, we were able to use that to push inter-
national agencies into contributing to all the efforts in western
Africa to help stop the outbreak.
Describe your work with Bloomberg Philan-
thropies to help people in other countries.
It’s been one of my passions since 2002 when I took my interna-
tional trip to Ghana to help with polio eradication. I went there
to teach the people on the ground about surveillance, about
checking data to appropriately identify if there are polio cases in
certain regions. I taught them how to use geographic informa-
tion software to help map out where all these different outbreaks
are occurring. ...
That international bug, and work, has really bitten me. In the
last couple of years working with Bloomberg Philanthropies,
I’ve accumulated a lot of miles. I work in a lot of different coun-
tries, and I get a lot of joy from that.
– Interview by Michael Hughes, IISE