
28 ISE Magazine | www.iise.org/ISEmagazine
The future of leadership education
in opportunities rather than problems; phase out established
products and services; balance change and continuity; and
motivate and retain top performers, creating a mindset among
employees that embraces positive change.
Burns introduced the comparative concepts of transactional
and transforming leadership while recent scholars focused on
strategic decisions as a fundamental resource for planning and
implementing changes within organizations. The process of
leadership has taken on new dimensions, reaching as far as the
ends of the globe and beyond. For example, the NASA leader-
ship program prepares its leaders to actively lead and manage
change within the team that integrates key stakeholders, cus-
tomers and organizational and programmatic goals and values.
How can leadership education prepare our future leaders so
that they can perform well in every facet of society? This ques-
tion is answered as we explore the past, present and future of
leadership education. We attempt to eliminate the mystique of
leadership education and offer 10 guidelines that will enhance
the role of leadership education in the 21st century.
Leadership education in the past
Leadership education traditionally has focused on the discus-
sion method via case studies and site visits to successful com-
panies. This method of learning is valuable to future leaders
but it lacked practical applications. In an effort to explore lead-
ership education, the following chronological milestones are
introduced:
Empowerment. This concept led to pushing the decision-
making process within the lower echelons of organizational
ranks.
Practice-orientation. This focus attempted to provide
an environment for applying what was acquired in leadership
education.
Participative democratic leadership. This type of lead-
ership attempted to encourage empowerment while not losing
track of the centralized leadership approach.
Systems theory. The organization is viewed as an entire
system and each strategic business unit as an integral part of a
greater whole.
Trait theory and transformational leadership mod-
els. This model introduced the follower as an important com-
ponent of leader-follow relationships.
Organizational learning. The focus was on the appli-
cation of what was learned versus the espoused concepts of
learning.
Change agents. This concept posited leaders as instru-
ments of change.
The above developments in leadership education are now
faced with dynamic changes occurring in the operational ef-
forts of organizations to gain and maintain market share, re-
cover from the pandemic and include a greater emphasis on
diversity, equity and inclusion.
These organizations have become increasingly interested in
the role that business programs at colleges and universities play
in preparing future leaders. Can leadership education prepare
our future leaders for the process changes that the 21st century
has and will encounter in the future?
Leadership education in the present
Today, there is a complete shift in leadership education from
the New England programs – which allow students from six
states enrolled in some programs not offered by their home-
state public colleges or universities to pay a reduced tuition
rate – to other more economical programs that attempt to
decolonize the curriculum. This shift in demand for leader-
ship education is based on the competition in the area of tu-
ition. Given the electronic nature and marketplace of higher
education, if New England does not address this problem
quickly, it could suffer tremendous losses in the public-en-
rollment area.
Many feel that higher education should focus less on eco-
nomic development and research missions and more on the
basics: general education, adult education, leadership and re-
sponsibility, and teacher training. Globally, business schools
such as Stanford University advocate leadership education that
transforms knowledge into impact and drives innovation with
Stanford LEAD, its flagship online global business program.
The most important objective of higher education should
be preparing undergraduates for a career in which they can
enjoy and prosper. The best way to prepare future leaders
comes from the research of Marilyn Taylor and her colleagues
(Management Learning, 2002) who found that: “Professional
leadership education traditionally begins with theoretical con-
structs and perspectives. If practical realities are represented, it
is typically in the form of case studies and/or discussions about
possible applications or practical implications. The educational
process that begins with and orients students to theory as the
Organizations need to develop
systematic methods to look for and
anticipate change; focus on, and invest
in opportunities rather than problems;
phase out established products and
services; balance change and continuity;
and motivate and retain top performers,
creating a mindset among employees
that embraces positive change.